1944 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1944 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Sable weights approximately 65 kg more than 1944 Cadillac 62.
Because 2009 Mercury Sable is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1944 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | 62 | Sable |
Year Released | 1944 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5676 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 263 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1925 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2870 mm |