1944 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Volvo C70
To start off, 2010 Volvo C70 is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1944 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2010 Volvo C70.
Because 1944 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1944 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1944 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | C70 |
| Year Released | 1944 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1740 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2639 mm |
