1944 Citroen 7 vs. 1968 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1968 Toyota Corona is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Citroen 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Citroen 7 would be higher. At 1,858 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Toyota Corona (140 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1944 Citroen 7. (33 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1944 Citroen 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Toyota Corona weights approximately 156 kg more than 1944 Citroen 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1944 Citroen 7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1944 Citroen 7 | 1968 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | 7 | Corona |
| Year Released | 1944 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1303 cc | 1858 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1056 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2650 mm |
