1944 Ford Taunus vs. 1966 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1966 Triumph 1300 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 1300 (57 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1944 Ford Taunus. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 1300 should accelerate faster than 1944 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 1300 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1944 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1944 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1944 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Ford Taunus | 1966 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Taunus | 1300 |
Year Released | 1944 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 57 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2460 mm |