1944 Peugeot 202 vs. 1965 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1965 Zastava 1500 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Zastava 1500 (53 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1944 Peugeot 202. (30 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 1944 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1944 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Peugeot 202 | 1965 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Peugeot | Zastava |
Model | 202 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1944 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1133 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2430 mm |