1944 Peugeot 202 vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1980 Volvo 265 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 265 (82 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1944 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1944 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 715 kg more than 1944 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1944 Peugeot 202 | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
| Model | 202 | 265 |
| Year Released | 1944 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1133 cc | 2315 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.1 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2660 mm |
