1944 Simca 5 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Simca 5 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 300 more horse power than 1944 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1944 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1389 kg more than 1944 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1944 Simca 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Simca 5 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Simca | Cadillac |
Model | 5 | CTS |
Year Released | 1944 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 570 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 14 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 564 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3220 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1280 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2880 mm |