1945 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1952 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1952 Cadillac 62 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1952 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 6C | 62 |
Year Released | 1945 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 5425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3210 mm |