1945 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1960 Austin A 90
To start off, 1960 Austin A 90 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Austin A 90 (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1960 Austin A 90 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | 6C | A 90 |
Year Released | 1945 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 72 L |