1945 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 6C | 62 |
Year Released | 1945 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 79 L |