1945 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1985 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 1985 Mercury Lynx is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 475 kg more than 1985 Mercury Lynx.
Because 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1985 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercury |
Model | 6C | Lynx |
Year Released | 1945 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1859 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2400 mm |