1945 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 220 kg more than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 6C | E |
Year Released | 1945 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72.1 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 68.2 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 70 L |