1945 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 127 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | Tracker |
Year Released | 1945 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 75 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1373 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 61 L |