1945 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 80 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 6C | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1945 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72.1 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 61 L |