1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 1950 Austin A 70
To start off, 1950 Austin A 70 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1950 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 1950 Austin A 70 | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Austin |
Model | 16 | A 70 |
Year Released | 1945 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 79.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 111.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2520 mm |