1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1950 Holden FX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 (70 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Holden |
Model | 16 | FX |
Year Released | 1945 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 51 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2620 mm |