1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 1962 Fiat 2300
To start off, 1962 Fiat 2300 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 2,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Fiat 2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Fiat 2300 (104 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Fiat 2300 should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1962 Fiat 2300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 1962 Fiat 2300 | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Fiat |
Model | 16 | 2300 |
Year Released | 1945 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2660 mm |