1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 1963 Maserati Quattroporte
To start off, 1963 Maserati Quattroporte is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 4,136 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Maserati Quattroporte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Maserati Quattroporte (256 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Maserati Quattroporte should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Maserati Quattroporte weights approximately 175 kg more than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 1963 Maserati Quattroporte | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Maserati |
Model | 16 | Quattroporte |
Year Released | 1945 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 4136 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2760 mm |