1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle
To start off, 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 3,768 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle (140 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 24 kg more than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Chevrolet |
Model | 16 | Chevelle |
Year Released | 1945 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 98.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1501 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2950 mm |