1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 1968 Triumph 2.5 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 392 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Triumph |
Model | 16 | 2.5 |
Year Released | 1945 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1133 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2700 mm |