1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 1979 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1979 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Chevrolet Camaro (110 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 30 kg more than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 1979 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Chevrolet |
Model | 16 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1945 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 4097 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 110 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2750 mm |