1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 1984 Toyota Model F
To start off, 1984 Toyota Model F is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (6 cylinders), 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Toyota Model F (76 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Toyota Model F should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1984 Toyota Model F.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 1984 Toyota Model F | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Toyota |
Model | 16 | Model F |
Year Released | 1945 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2240 mm |