1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Mazda |
| Model | 16 | 626 |
| Year Released | 1945 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2620 mm |
