1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 1 kg more than 1998 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 1998 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Chevrolet |
| Model | 16 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1945 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 5666 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1524 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2570 mm |
