1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 2002 Ford Focus
To start off, 2002 Ford Focus is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. Both 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 and 2002 Ford Focus are equipped with a 1,989 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Focus (109 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 325 kg more than 2002 Ford Focus.
Because 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 2002 Ford Focus | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Ford |
Model | 16 | Focus |
Year Released | 1945 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2620 mm |