1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 2002 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 135 kg more than 2002 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 2002 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Mazda |
| Model | 16 | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2710 mm |
