1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher.
Because 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Mitsubishi |
Model | 16 | Colt |
Year Released | 1945 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |