1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (6 cylinders), 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 75 (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2005 Rover 75.
Because 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 2005 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Rover |
| Model | 16 | 75 |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1796 cc |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1415 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2750 mm |
