1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (6 cylinders), 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (79 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 363 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.

Because 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 2006 Volkswagen Polo
Make Armstrong Siddeley Volkswagen
Model 16 Polo
Year Released 1945 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1989 cc 1422 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 70 HP 79 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65 mm 79.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 95.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 7.0:1 19.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1525 kg 1162 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4200 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2930 mm 2470 mm