1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 265 kg more than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 2008 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Cadillac |
| Model | 16 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3175 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2890 mm |
