1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 2009 Audi TT
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (6 cylinders), 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 2009 Audi TT | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Audi |
| Model | 16 | TT |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 82.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 92.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2470 mm |
