1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 2009 Ford F-250
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 559 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 2009 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Ford |
| Model | 16 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 5399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 12.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 3610 mm |
