1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 2010 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2010 Ford Bantam is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (6 cylinders), 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Bantam (74 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Bantam should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 505 kg more than 2010 Ford Bantam.
Because 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 2010 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Ford |
Model | 16 | Bantam |
Year Released | 1945 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 74 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2670 mm |