1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (6 cylinders), 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16.
Because 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Nissan |
| Model | 16 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 79 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1666 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2449 mm |
