1945 Austin 16 vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1968 Nissan Cedric is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1945 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1945 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 46 kg more than 1945 Austin 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1945 Austin 16. (147 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1945 Austin 16.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Austin 16 | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 16 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1945 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |