1945 Austin 16 vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1972 Triumph 2000 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Triumph 2000 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1945 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1945 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Austin 16 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1945 Austin 16 (147 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1945 Austin 16 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Austin 16 | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | 16 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1945 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |