1945 Austin 16 vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1945 Austin 16 (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1945 Austin 16 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1945 Austin 16.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1945 Austin 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1945 Austin 16 (147 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1945 Austin 16 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Austin 16 | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | 16 | CJ7 |
Year Released | 1945 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2380 mm |