1945 Austin 16 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1945 Austin 16 (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1945 Austin 16 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Austin 16 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1945 Austin 16 (147 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1945 Austin 16 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Austin 16 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | 16 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1945 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2160 mm |
