1945 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1945 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 2003 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1945 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1605 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2680 mm |
