1945 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1945 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 425 kg more than 2010 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1945 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 62 | Bravo |
Year Released | 1945 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5676 cc | 1747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1435 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2610 mm |