1945 Citroen 7A vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Volvo 66 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Citroen 7A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Citroen 7A would be higher. At 1,303 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Citroen 7A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1945 Citroen 7A. (33 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1945 Citroen 7A.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1945 Citroen 7A, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 1945 Citroen 7A has manual transmission. 1945 Citroen 7A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Citroen 7A | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 7A | 66 |
Year Released | 1945 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1303 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |