1945 Citroen 7A vs. 2008 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2008 Suzuki Reno is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Citroen 7A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Citroen 7A would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Suzuki Reno (128 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1945 Citroen 7A. (35 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1945 Citroen 7A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 40 kg more than 1945 Citroen 7A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Citroen 7A | 2008 Suzuki Reno | |
| Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
| Model | 7A | Reno |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1627 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2610 mm |
