1945 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 1,775 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Jaguar Mark IV is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Jaguar Mark IV weights approximately 290 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio.
Because 1945 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Jaguar Mark IV | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | Mark IV | Clio |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1775 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 98 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2590 mm |
