1945 Jeep CJ2 vs. 1963 Volvo 120
To start off, 1963 Volvo 120 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep CJ2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep CJ2 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Jeep CJ2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Volvo 120 (67 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Volvo 120 should accelerate faster than 1945 Jeep CJ2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Jeep CJ2 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1963 Volvo 120.
Because 1945 Jeep CJ2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Volvo 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1945 Jeep CJ2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1945 Jeep CJ2 (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1945 Jeep CJ2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Jeep CJ2 | 1963 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ2 | 120 |
Year Released | 1945 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |