1945 Jeep CJ2 vs. 1978 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1978 Toyota Celica is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep CJ2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep CJ2 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Jeep CJ2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1945 Jeep CJ2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Jeep CJ2 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica.
Because 1945 Jeep CJ2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1945 Jeep CJ2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Toyota Celica (152 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1978 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1945 Jeep CJ2.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Jeep CJ2 | 1978 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | CJ2 | Celica |
Year Released | 1945 | 1978 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |