1945 Jeep CJ2 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Volvo 66 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep CJ2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep CJ2 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Jeep CJ2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1945 Jeep CJ2 (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1945 Jeep CJ2 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Jeep CJ2 weights approximately 288 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1945 Jeep CJ2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1945 Jeep CJ2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Jeep CJ2 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Jeep | Volvo |
| Model | CJ2 | 66 |
| Year Released | 1945 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1390 mm |
