1945 Jeep CJ2 vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1982 Opel Ascona is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep CJ2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep CJ2 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Jeep CJ2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Jeep CJ2 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Because 1945 Jeep CJ2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Opel Ascona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1945 Jeep CJ2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1945 Jeep CJ2 (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (94 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1945 Jeep CJ2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Jeep CJ2 | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Jeep | Opel |
Model | CJ2 | Ascona |
Year Released | 1945 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2580 mm |