1945 Jeep CJ2 vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep CJ2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep CJ2 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Jeep CJ2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1945 Jeep CJ2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1945 Jeep CJ2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1945 Jeep CJ2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1945 Jeep CJ2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (157 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (146 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1945 Jeep CJ2.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Jeep CJ2 | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ2 | 626 |
Year Released | 1945 | 1992 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2620 mm |