1945 Jeep CJ2 vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep CJ2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep CJ2 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Jeep CJ2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Kangoo (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1945 Jeep CJ2.
Because 1945 Jeep CJ2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Renault Kangoo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1945 Jeep CJ2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Kangoo (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1945 Jeep CJ2.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Jeep CJ2 | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | CJ2 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1945 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |