1945 Jeep CJ2 vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep CJ2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep CJ2 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 1945 Jeep CJ2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 360 kg more than 1945 Jeep CJ2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1945 Jeep CJ2.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Jeep CJ2 | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | CJ2 | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1945 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |